CASE · TENDER RESPONSE

Twenty-eight tender files, opened one by one

A food services group answers framework tenders by opening every file by hand. Our assistant fills each row with its source, and the bid team accepts the answers and decides whether to bid.

The facts sit in every kind of file

Twenty-eight tender files, some protected, opened by hand by the bid team. Facts sit in every kind of file, licence numbers are pasted by hand, and bid or no bid is decided on instinct.

Some of the twenty-eight files are protected. Licence numbers are pasted by hand, and bid or no bid is decided on instinct.

Each answer arrives with its source

The tender agent reads the files, answers each row with its source and flags rows for named people; the bid manager reviews the package and signs off before it is submitted. Illustrative workflow with sample data.

The assistant works from the files as they are. Rows it cannot answer go to a named person, and nothing is submitted without a person.

The same job, before and after

Answering a tender questionnaire, before and after the AI agent, ending on the GeBIZ submission receipt after a person signs off. Illustrative workflow with sample data.

Illustrative workflow with sample data. It ends on the GeBIZ receipt, after a person signs off.

Where it stands

Demonstrated

It runs on sample company files, twenty-eight wiki pages, and a real tender structure.

Pilot under discussion

It has not yet run on the group’s own files.

What changes

MeasureBeforeWith the agent
Staff time per tender response≈ 16 hours≈ 6 hours

Figures marked ≈ are estimates for a typical case, not measured results. They are replaced with the client’s own figures once measured.

Talk to us

Bring a past bundle. We show what the assistant would have filled and what it would have left to you.

enquiry@redesignyour.work

Redesign · Redesign the way you work.

Section5 Intelligence Pte. Ltd. · Singapore

enquiry@redesignyour.work